Displaying items by tag: Books and Ideas

An Open Letter to Parents Who Worry about What Their Teens Write

Monday, 14 November 2011 10:42
Share this post:

A little while back a mom emailed me because she was worried about the topics her teen daughter was choosing to write about (including incest, violence, and other uncomfy topics). Since then, I've gotten a few similar letters, so I thought I would share my thoughts on ways of responding respectfully to teen writing--even when it doesn't look like what parents might prefer.

If the topic of teen writing/reading as a starting place for crucial conversations interests you, check out my post on the whole "YA books are too dark" controversy. 

Dear parents,

Thanks for your confidence that I might have some wisdom to offer. Here's my take as a writer, teacher, and also a mom.

I get why you're concerned about your teens' writing. Still, I think the best thing to do is to keep the lines of communication open and not try to control what they explore in writing. Ditto for their reading. The reality is that teens will read what they want--either with our knowledge or (if we try to limit their access) without it. But when we know what they're reading (and even read the same things), we can use that material as a starting point for important discussions.

To be honest, it's my experience that by age 12-13, many young people are either involved in or intrigued by what we parents consider "adult" behaviors. Helping our teens navigate these adult waters--that's the privilege (and burden!) of parenting and mentoring.

One thought: talk with your teen about why the situations they've  written about intrigue them. See if you can't also help them see the blessing of a "boring" life as well as the depth of the scars that those "interesting" experiences might leave on those who have suffered them. I hear from young people with "boring" lives who say that reading my first novel, WHAT CAN'T WAIT, made them appreciate their parents' support and involvement--even those aspects that they might previously have resented.

Hope this helps!

Ashley Hope Pérez

How to Starve Your Brain to Make It Create

Wednesday, 09 November 2011 10:13
Share this post:

Here's today crazy idea for creativity in a nutshell: deprive yourself of everything interesting and stimulating to force your brain to generate something interesting of its own.

Before you get too amazed or weirded out on me, let me announce that I cannot take credit for this plan: it comes from Twyla Tharp's book, The Creative Habit. Tharp is a hugely creative person (dancer and choreographer), but she chalks most of that success up to discipline. Here's a bit from Chapter 1 to show you what I mean:

After so many years, I've learned that being creative is a full-time job with its own daily patterns. That's why writers, for example, like to establish routines for themselves. The most productive ones get started early in the morning, when the world is quiet, the phones aren't ringing, and their minds are rested, alert, and not yet polluted by other people's words. They might set a goal for themselves -- write fifteen hundred words, or stay at their desk until noon -- but the real secret is that they do this every day. In other words, they are disciplined. Over time, as the daily routines become second nature, discipline morphs into habit... More than anything, this book is about preparation: In order to be creative you have to know how to prepare to be creative.

But back to the specific suggestion I mentioned--that of taking away input. What does Tharp's advice mean for those of us who have been raised on the notion of feeding creativity?

For starters, Tharp is not saying that writers should stop reading and learning from great books. Tharp will be the first to tell us that we should attend with great care to works we admire (should like to stop people everywhere from listening to music while they work, for example. We ought to be single-mindedly listening to really honor the music).

But when it's time to create, Tharp advocates an absolute fast, no goodies for the brain. Bore yourself so that you will make something up out of desperation.

Tharp describes not even letting herself read the label on the cereal box, but even if you don't want to go that far, consider scaling back your multi-tasking and entertainment fillers. Instead of texting or playing fruit ninja (guilty, guilty), try using time waiting in line, on the metro, driving, or whatever to cook the project you're working on. What small problem can you turn over in your mind? What small advance can you make?

Especially when I'm in the revision phase of a project, I have to scale my audiobook listening way back to make sure that my brain stays on the job of my book.

So there, go forth and get bored. And then get creative.

Knowing "the Rules" and Knowing When to Break Them

Monday, 24 October 2011 10:35
Share this post:

A while back agent-turned-author Nathan Bransford did a "Five Openings to Avoid" post that takes a jab at some of the obvious and overused openings that circulate, especially among novice writers.

You know, the story that starts with a character gazing at herself in the mirror just so the writer can work in a physical description. That kind of thing.

I was in the final revision stage for The Knife and the Butterfly when I read Bransford's post. The Knife and the Butterfly begins with Azael, the protag, waking up. So imagine my chagrin when I saw the following on Bransford's list:

A character waking up: Sure, there's probably a good reason the character is getting woken up. Maybe their house is on fire/they're late for school/they just realized their insides are being sucked out by a sea monster. But not only is waking up overdone, what exactly is gained by showing a character wake up? Why not just cut to the insides-getting-sucked-out chase?

This is pretty true. But it's also important to know that there are plenty of good reasons to do things that are, by and large, a bad idea. What to do in my shoes?

Sit down and make sure you have lots of good reasons for why you've written something the way it is. (And, no, the fact that your current opening is already written is not a good enough reason to leave it.)

Here's a strategy that I use for endings: write 10 alternative endings to what you thought "had" to happen. You might still come back and decide your original direction was the right one, but you'll also have carefully considered your alternatives.

For The Knife and the Butterfly, I spent a day brainstorming alternative openings before deciding that it needed to open as it does, that my reasons for breaking the rules trump the reasons the rules were in place.

But you be the judge. Here's the opening few paragraphs from The Knife and the Butterfly. 

Im standing inches from a wall, staring at a half-finished piece. Even though Im too close to read what it says, I know its my work. I run my hands over the black curves outlined in silver. I lean in and sniff. Nothing, not a whiff of fumes. When did I start this? It doesnt matter; Ill finish it now. I start to shake the can in my hand, but all I hear is a hollow rattle. I toss the can down and reach for another, then another. Empty. Theyre all empty.

I wake up with that all over shitty feeling you get the day after a rumble. Head splitting, guts twisted. All that’s left of my dream is a memory of black and silver. I sit up, thinking about snatching the baggie from under the couch and going to the back lot for a joint before Pelón can bust my balls for smoking his weed.

Except then I realize I’m not at Pelón’s. I’m on this narrow cot with my legs all tangled up in a raggedy-ass blanket. It’s dark except for a fluorescent flicker from behind me. I get loose of the covers and take four steps one way before I’m up against another concrete wall. Six steps the other way, and I’m bumping into the shitter in the corner. There’s a sink right by it.  No mirror.  Drain bolted into the concrete floor. I can make out words scrawled in Sharpie on the wall to one side of the cot: WELCUM HOME FOOL. I turn around, already half-knowing what I’m going to see.

Bars. Through them, I take in the long row of cells just like this one. I’m in lock-up. Shit, juvie again? It’s only been four months since I got out of Houston Youth Village.  Village, my ass.

I sit back down on the cot and try to push through the fog in my brain from the shit we smoked yesterday. Thing is, I’ve got no memory of getting brought in here. It’s like I want to replay that part, but my brain’s a jacked-up DVD player that skips back again and again to the same damn scene, the last thing I can remember right.

You can read a longer excerpt from The Knife and the Butterfly here, or buy the whole book in February!

Best of the National Day on Writing

Friday, 21 October 2011 10:24
Share this post:


Yesterday, the third official National Day on Writing, was a huge success! You definitely don't want to miss out on hearing from five writers via the National Writing Project's blogtalk radio show. Listen to the show online here. I'm there in the last section of the show, talking about how writing with my students led to two published YA novels. Other guests include writers for the New York Times and The New Yorker and a teen who uses Figment.com to share his writing. Really great stuff! Some of my favorite bits from the show include Katherine Schulten talking about "drinking the Koolaid" at the National Writing Project (I did, too!),  Fernanda Santos describing what it's like to work for a world-class newspaper when writing in a second language,  Dana Goodyear describing how Figment.com grew out of her experiences interviewing Japanese women writing novels on their cell phones, and teen-writer James Loveless describing his journey from closet writer to member of a vast community on Figment (apparently Figment users are called "Figgies"!).

Many partner sites are running posts with more extended reflections on why folks from different walks of life write. Mine for the National Writing Project is here. I love HEATHER WOLPERT-GAWRON's Edutopia piece on what writing has meant at different stages of her life. Here's one section that resonated with me:

When I was 35, I wrote because a fire was lit within me and I discovered the National Writing Project. I was introduced to the greatest teachers of writing. I was introduced to a room of educators who believed that they could change education by teaching students to communicate their logic, their passions, and their dreams, through their writing, regardless of one's subject matter.

Read Heather's whole essay here. You can also cruise to the bottom of this NWP page to find annotated links to heaps of essays by writers from science teachers to memoirists to novelists. Really, really good stuff.

There's also a nice recap of the #whyIwrite tweets at the fun, formidible, and f**k-where-were-you-when-I-was-a-teen site, Figment.com:·http://blog.figment.com/2011/10/20/whyiwrite/. Of course, you ought to go explore the thousands of #whyIwrite tweets for yourself--that's what hash tags are fore, after all.

 

 

Low-tech Writing Strategies

Wednesday, 21 September 2011 11:00
Share this post:

Recently I blogged about my favorite high-tech writing tool, Scrivener. Today, though, a bit about the benefits of going low-tech--at least some of the time.

It's not just me, either. Award-winning author Neal Stephenson describes how writing with an old-fashioned fountain pen fits in his writing process:

JM: You write with a fountain pen.

NS: Yes.

JM: Have you always done that?

NS: No...I've become such a fast typist that I could slam out great big blocks of text quite rapidly -- anything that came into my head, it would just dribble out of my fingers onto the screen. That includes bad stuff as well as good stuff. Once it's out there on the screen, of course, you can edit it and you can fix the bad stuff, but it's far better not to ever write down the bad stuff at all. With the fountain pen, which is a slower output device, the material stays in the buffer of your head for a longer period. So during that amount of time, you can fix it, you can make it better, you can even decide not to write it down at all -- you can think better of writing it. Editing, strangely enough, is quicker and easier with a pen. Because drawing a line through a word is just faster than any sequence of grabbing your mouse and highlighting the word and hitting the eject key. That act of editing leaves behind a visible trace of the word that you decided to change, and sometimes that's useful; you may want to go back and change your mind about that. Finally, I find that writing with a pen is a physically healthier activity. There's actually more range of movement involved with it than there is sitting with your fingers on the keys for hours at a time. So I just physically felt better when I was using the pen rather than typing.

The idea that slow is better may come as a surprise--but the time to think is a big boon, especially for folks who tend to write best through a careful first draft. Another thing here: how it feels to be writing. I share Stephenson's sense that there's something more satisfying physically in long-hand composition. (For me, another benefit is the reduced temptation to distract myself from my task via the Internet.)

My writing process is a hybrid one. Although I tend to write "the real novel" with a word processor, much of my pre-writing happens long hand. I work extensively in two notebooks. The first is a medium-sized moleskin for jotting ideas, taking notes, copying quotes. The second is a larger-format notebook dedicated to a single novel project. I work in it from both sides, one side for research and background information, the other for character development, exploratory sketches, and preliminary scenes.

Stephenson's process has a few more elements worth reading about. Here he discusses the different pens he uses and why:

NS: ... I've got this one here, which is a Waterman, that my wife gave me in, probably, 1988. So that's a twenty-year-old pen. It's got a fine nib, and I don't normally use it for first drafts. I use this for editing. I've got a couple of fat-nib pens that I tend to use for the first draft. One is an extremely high-tech Jorg Hysek pen that's made out of carbon fiber and advanced metals; it looks like a cruise missile. I wouldn't buy such a thing, but someone gave it to me, and it's my favorite for first draft stuff. Then I've got another Waterman, a Rotring, and a couple of others. I tend to do first draft in a thick nib. And I have different color of ink in each pen. Then I go back the next day with this Waterman, and do the editing pass, so I can see the contrasting colors and line widths, and kind of assemble a history in my own mind of how this page came into being.

Of course, you don't need to go buy any fancy-pants pens, but you might find that changing colors at different stages of composition helps you organize your process. I'm thinking of giving it a try.

Read the whole interview with Stephenson·here.

Experts Trump the Internet. I Swear.

Monday, 05 September 2011 10:04
Share this post:

I like a short cut as well as anyone else, but sometimes--especially when it comes to research for writing--the Internet can't deliver the details you can get from an expert.

The Internet is great for a quick fact check, but when you want depth, it's best to seek out resources that aren't stored there.

An instructor at a writing conference put it this way: "If you want to find out about stamps, skip the Internet and go talk to a collector." You get to the right information more quickly. This is especially important for writers who may not have a specific question ("When was X coin put into use?") but want to gather more general material. Sometiems you don't even know what you want to know yet.

This is where I find myself as I research life in Depression-era East Texas. Internet is so-so for help. Books are better. Regional museums and primary materials, even better. But best of all: oral histories and real interviews. That's how I've gotten the best level of detail to lend the right texture to my new novel-to-be. Plus I don't spend so much time drifting through semi-helpful web content when I should be writing.

STORY OF A GIRL Goes Well with WCW and TFO

Wednesday, 24 August 2011 09:39
Share this post:

One of the things I love about reading YA is discovering new company for books I love--especially imagining how I'd group them and what recommendations I'd offer to folks who've loved a book.

Here's the Library of Congress book summary:

In the three years since her father caught her in the back seat of a car with an older boy, sixteen-year-old Deanna’s life at home and school has been a nightmare, but while dreaming of escaping with her brother and his family, she discovers the power of forgiveness.

A while back I blogged about connections between Blythe Woolston's The Freak Observer and my first novel, What Can't Wait. For readers who liked either or both, my next recommendation would be Story of a Girl. Some common denominators: family tensions, financial stress, a sibling/niece who is a source of concern and love, identity quests, and less-than-healthy encounters with the opposite sex.

In Story of a Girl, Zarr cracks open and humanizes a character whose self-esteem has taken a hit because of bad choices and the bad luck of living in a small town where fresh starts are hard to come by. And everything about Deanna's thought process (as a very young teen drawn to the attention of an older guy) rings true--to be desired (and noticed) at that age is just intoxicating--and dangerous for sense of self. I had similar thoughts and responses when I got a little of the wrong kind of attention from my older brother's friend when I was twelve.

Another something amazing: Zarr shows how friendship can reshape our lives--and our ways of responding to hurt. When Deanna betrays a friend and receives forgiveness for it, that starts to change how she relates to other people in her life, including her dad and the boy who took advantage of her when she was just a girl.

Read more about my thoughts on teens and sex here. Because teens do have bodies that matter, and sex is part of what we all think and live.

PS I give Deanne permission to like her English teacher and keep a writer's notebook because she isn't all dorky and pretentious about it (as I probably was back when I was in high school). Consider her untouched by the gripes in this earlier rant.

Book Serendipity: Literary Soulmates and More

Monday, 22 August 2011 10:30
Share this post:

One of my favorite things about being a bookish person is crossing paths with other bookish people. And what I like best about those experiences is when I meet someone who reads like I do, which means we share both a number of past experiences with books as well as the potential for a reading future together. Such a person's book recommendations are worth their weight in gold. So are the potential conversations we might have. 

The first time this happened to me was with a professor/mentor type at UT Austin when I was an undergrad. I never had a class with Brian Doherty--my loss--but he always ran the UT writing contests, and so I got to know him through that. (Any time my writing had the potential to earn me cash, you better believe I was in!) We loved a lot of the same books, and so when he recommended Junot Díaz's collection of stories, Drown, I was in 100%. Same with Mistry Rohinton's A Fine Balance and a ton of other delicious reads. But what I liked best was the surprise and delight of the books we both had under our belt.

Of course, book serendipity shows up in all kinds of other ways, too. Like last week I discovered that my editor, Andrew Karre, was behind one of the first YA novels that got me interested in writing YA myself, How It's Done, by Christine Kole MacLean. This entry from his blog exposed the connection. Here's the relevant bit:

The very first YA novel I acquired, edited, and published entirely was a realistic YA (How It's Done by Christine Kole MacLean). Novels like Christine's were a prime entry point for me--they're the Neapolitan of my YA reading life--but I pretty quickly branched out, and now I value all of the ways the various YA sub genres riff on the basic YA ingredients and techniques: teenage experience and character-driven storytelling. 

The funny thing is, the part about How It's Done is just a small example in the post, which is really about genres and sub-genres in YA, but it was the point of spark and excitement for me in reading it. In my head, Andrew's post is filled under "Holy cow, Andrew and I have another book in common" and "How cool is it that Andrew edited this book?!"

By the way, even though How It's Done isn't my favorite book of all time, what caught my attention was how it was built in part out of a world I recognized (the evangelical community). Somehow that recognizable aspect made the idea of writing a N.O.V.E.L. seem less daunting. Like maybe it could be thought in lowercase letters. 

Channel your inner engineer and liberate your library: DIY book scanner

Wednesday, 17 August 2011 10:42
Share this post:

Here's what happens if you're me and you wish you could digitize the essentials of your personal library and take it with you for your year in Paris: you mope around saying things like, "Man, wish I could digitize my library and take it with me. Oh well."

Here's what happens if you're an engineer and you think something similar: you build a super-fast, easy-to-use, do-it-yourself book scanner.

Check out what my web designer Justin Ray worked up here. And if you're a little more motivated than I am, you'll channel your inner engineer and have a rocking tool to digitize your library. Justin's post has more details, but here are his Youtube video demos to tantalize you:

P.S. Justin also does the web design for my site and designed a super-cool (and free) Joomla plugin that you can use to integrate Goodreads reviews directly (and automatically) into your own site. Read more at www.314pies.com.

Liam’s bath toys, soggy library books, and the perils of autopilot for writers

Monday, 01 August 2011 10:28
Share this post:

 What does my little boy’s bath time have to do with writing?

Let me start by describing Liam’s pre-bath routine: once the bath water is running, Liam grabs this basket of toys he has in the bathroom and starts pitching them into the tub one by one. There are about a zillion neon-colored plastic things and rubber ducks, but eventually he runs out. At that point, either I put him into the bathtub as well or he will find something else to throw in. Like the basket. Or the toilet paper stand. Or anything else that’s not nailed down. If we chose to store, I don’t know, a small stack of library books in that bathroom, they would now be a small, wet stack of library books swirling amid his rubber ducks.

My library books would be wet because once Liam is in his everything-in-the-tub mode, it’s hard to stop him. We writer types go on autopilot like that sometimes, too, tossing certain stuff (that description, a character type, certain ways of resolving conflict, chapter openings) into our drafts without a lot of thought to what it’s going to add to the experience. (And let me tell you: even if Liam throws them in, he is not crazy about swimming with library books.)

Don’t get me wrong: I’m not dissing automatic writing (like freewrites, where you just scribble or type and see what comes out). In fact, I’m a huge fan of zero drafting. It’s pretty much how I manage to get started writing anything.

Autopilot, though, is more or less the enemy. Two-dimensional secondary characters usually get written on autopilot. So does bad dialogue. And I’m guessing that when I can’t really say why I’m writing in first or third person, it’s because I just went on autopilot and did the thing I did last time.

Here’s my (unsolicited) advice: if you realize you just did your day’s writing on autopilot, don’t panic. Just flag that passage and know that, at some point, you need to go back and make sure you’re making decisions, not settling into familiar ruts. For now, you can keep writing; if you’re in the middle of a big project, chances are you haven’t derailed anything by a day of autopilot.

Eventually, though, you’ll need to make sure there are no soggy library books in your tub.

<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
Page 4 of 10